Why Bridgepoint Evaluation is Adopting 'Interest-Holder' Over 'Stakeholder'

Written By Kayla Meyers

At Bridgepoint Evaluation, our commitment to fostering inclusivity and respect within the communities we serve is paramount. As part of this commitment, we have chosen to replace the term "stakeholder" with "interest-holder" in our communications and practices. This decision stems from a deeper understanding of the historical and cultural implications associated with the term "stakeholder" and our desire to promote language that aligns with our values of equity and respect.

Understanding the Implications of 'Stakeholder'

The term "stakeholder" has been widely used to describe individuals or groups with an interest or concern in a particular endeavor. However, its origins and connotations have come under scrutiny:

  • Colonial Associations: Historically, "staking" land referred to the practice of marking territory during colonial expansions, often leading to the displacement of Indigenous populations. The term "stakeholder" can inadvertently evoke these colonial practices, making its use potentially insensitive, especially when engaging with Indigenous communities.

  • Power Dynamics: The concept of a "stake" implies ownership or control, which may not accurately reflect the relationships and dynamics we aim to cultivate. Using "stakeholder" can unintentionally reinforce hierarchical structures, suggesting that only those with a "stake" or ownership have valid interests, thereby marginalizing other pertinent voices.

These insights were drawn from The Ontario Centre for Learning, Research, and Innovation in Long-Term Care (The CLRI at Bruyère) and The Office of Community Engagement at McMaster University, who have led conversations on the importance of shifting to more inclusive language. Their piece, "Interest-Holder: Replacing the Term Stakeholder", provides a well-researched perspective on why this shift matters, particularly in the context of health research and community engagement.

The Shift to 'Interest-Holder'

To address these concerns and promote a more inclusive approach, we are adopting the term "interest-holder." This term offers several advantages:

  • Inclusivity: "Interest-holder" encompasses all individuals or groups affected by or interested in a project or decision, regardless of their level of power or ownership. It recognizes the legitimacy of diverse perspectives and experiences, aligning with our commitment to equity.

  • Neutral Connotation: Unlike "stakeholder," "interest-holder" lacks historical baggage, making it a more neutral and respectful term, particularly in contexts involving Indigenous communities.

  • Clarity in Engagement: By using "interest-holder," we emphasize the importance of engaging with all parties who have an interest in our work, fostering a more collaborative and participatory approach.

Our Commitment to Inclusive Practices

This change is more than a semantic adjustment; it reflects our dedication to continuous learning and the intentional use of language that respects and acknowledges the histories and preferences of the communities we engage with. We believe that adopting "interest-holder" will enhance our ability to build genuine, respectful partnerships and ensure that diverse voices are heard and valued in our evaluation processes.

We’re grateful for the work of The MUSE Consortium in sparking this conversation and encouraging organizations to reflect on their language choices.

We welcome feedback from our partners and the broader community as we implement this change and continue our journey toward more inclusive and equitable practices.

Kayla Meyers